AI in everyday work
AI in property management: three workflows that ease the shared inbox
A repair report, a service charge question, a noise complaint: in the shared inbox of a management office, everything lands at once. This article walks through three workflows. You see how an AI colleague works with the documents of your properties. You also see what can be connected to your property management software, from GARAIO REM to Abacus, and where the limits are.
In brief
- In the Digital Real Estate Index 2026, property management reaches 4.4 out of 10 points. That is the highest value since the survey began. In the hype cycle, AI and machine learning are the only one of the twelve technologies surveyed that show clear progress.1
- Kisuno works with the documents of your properties: tenancy agreements, house rules, regulations and past correspondence become the knowledge base the drafts are built from.
- Every reply to a tenant is a draft that someone approves. Legally binding notices such as terminations and rent adjustments stay with the property manager.
- Tenant data stays in Switzerland or on your own server and does not train any models. Software with a documented interface for exchanging data can be connected, for example Microsoft 365 or GARAIO REM. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is what carries that connection.
Starting point: more correspondence than people to write it
Digitalisation in the Swiss construction and real estate sector is moving in small steps. For the Digital Real Estate Index 2026 by pom+ Consulting, around 200 specialists and executives were surveyed. Property management reaches 4.4 out of 10 points, the highest value since the survey began. The overall index stands at 4.3. In the hype cycle, AI and machine learning are the only one of the twelve technologies surveyed that show clear progress. Around two thirds of respondents see high value in them, down from 75% in the previous survey. What slows the development down are questions of investment and cost.1
On top of that comes the need for staff in day-to-day operations. SVIT notes that a lack of experienced personnel in facility management gets in the way of maintenance and of the smooth operation of properties.2 Whoever cannot fill an open position spreads the work across the existing team. The first thing to suffer is the response time towards tenants, and an unanswered repair report turns into a complaint to the owner two weeks later.
A large part of that work is correspondence that follows a fixed pattern: the service charge statement and the questions that follow it, the rent adjustment tied to the reference interest rate, the formal requirements for terminations, the handover report with the orders to the contractors. Then there is the language mix. The same matter goes out in German, French, Italian or English depending on the tenant. So the question is no longer whether a management office uses AI. The question is whether the AI works with the documents of its own properties, and where the tenant data sits while it does.
- An enquiry in the shared inbox, exactly as it arrives
- Assigned by type of request and by property
- A reply drafted from the property’s own documents
- Review and approval by the property manager
Use case 1: sorting and answering tenant enquiries
On Monday morning the shared inbox holds the messages from the weekend: a dripping boiler, questions about the service charge statement, a noise complaint from the third floor, a termination for the end of the quarter, several requests for a spare key. The AI colleague reads the inbox through the connected mailbox. It assigns each message to a type of request and to a property, and places a draft reply next to it.
The draft comes from the documents of the property concerned: the tenancy agreement, the house rules, the regulations and the previous correspondence with this tenant. For the repair report, the draft states who fixes the fault and what information is still missing. For the spare key request, it states the rule from the regulations, with the source reference, so the statement can be checked in seconds. The message goes to the responsible property manager, who reads it, corrects it and approves it.
- An enquiry from the shared inbox, in the tenant’s language
- The property’s documents, with permissions per tool and a full log
- A draft reply with its source, ready for approval
What matters in practice: no new tenant portal and no second system appear. The AI colleague works in the mailbox you already have, and tenants keep writing to the same address. The red lines stay in place too: terminations, rent adjustments and formal warnings are legally binding notices and never go out automatically. And a repair report stays a report, whatever the draft makes of it: under Article 257g of the Code of Obligations, tenants must report defects they do not have to remedy themselves, and once it arrives the landlord is on notice.6 The formal requirements and deadlines of Swiss tenancy law remain the responsibility of the management office.
Use case 2: explaining the service charge statement in plain words
After the statements go out, the same wave arrives every year: why is my statement higher than last year. The questions all land within the same two weeks, and they land on a team that is processing the additional payments and the refunds at the same time.
The AI colleague pulls up the statement for that apartment, the allocation key and the figures from the previous year, and drafts an explanation in plain language: which item has gone up, how the share is calculated, what the comparison with last year shows. The draft is written in the language the enquiry came in, in German, French, Italian or English. The property manager checks the figures and approves. That makes the seasonal peak manageable. It no longer has to be absorbed through temporary staff alone.
- The tenant’s question about the statement
- The statement, the allocation key and last year’s figures
- An explanation in the tenant’s language, ready for approval
What the workflow does not do: it does not correct a statement and it does not charge anything. It explains what the statement says. If an item really is wrong, the case goes to accounting, as before. If a tenant asks to inspect the receipts, that is not a special favour but a right under Article 257b paragraph 2 of the Code of Obligations, and the office grants it.6 Because every explanation rests on the stored statement, the property manager sees immediately what the draft is based on.
Use case 3: from the handover to the contractor orders
The handover takes an hour, the paperwork afterwards often takes longer. On the way back the property manager dictates the notes into the phone, the device’s dictation function is enough, or types them in: kitchen front scratched, silicone in the bathroom to be renewed, living room walls to be painted, photo list attached.
Out of that come the draft handover report in the company format and the worded orders to the painter, the plumber and the cleaning company, with address, apartment number, access arrangements and deadline. On the same day, instead of at the weekend. Who gets the job, who bears the cost and where normal wear ends and damage begins is decided by the management office. The AI colleague supplies the text.
- Notes and photo list from the handover
- One input, three documents in the company format
- Report and contractor orders, ready for approval
Here too: no order goes out without approval, and nothing is charged automatically. What is billed to the tenant is decided by the office, and every change to a draft stays traceable.
Connectors: what can be linked to GARAIO REM, Abacus and the rest of your software
An AI colleague is only as useful as what it is allowed to reach. MCP is an open standard for connecting external systems. Through it, programs with a documented interface can be addressed. An interface, often called an API, is a described route along which two programs exchange data. Permissions apply per individual tool, and every call is written to the log. This is the state of play for common property management software, checked in September 2026:
| Software | Interface | Connection to Kisuno |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft 365 (shared Outlook mailbox, SharePoint) | Graph API, openly documented | Connection via MCP possible and the most direct route for sorting tenant enquiries. Microsoft’s own MCP servers are in preview; alongside them there are open servers built on the Graph API |
| GARAIO REM | Two documented interfaces: a GraphQL interface for reads and a message bus for events and writes, covering around 20 business contexts from master data through letting and rent to damage cases. Sign-in uses an access token, as is usual with OAuth 2.03 | Connection via MCP possible; access runs through the vendor as a service partner |
| Abacus with AbaImmo | REST API with OAuth2, access through the partner programme | Connection via MCP possible; access runs through the Abacus partner channel |
| ImmoTop2 (W&W Immo Informatik) | Publicly documented DMS interface for document workflows4 | Connection possible for document filing |
| Rimo R5 (W&W Immo Informatik) | File and export oriented interfaces | The route runs via exports and documents |
| SwissRETS | Open standard for property data, documented and published under the MIT licence5 | Connectable for listing data |
| bexio | REST API, openly documented | Connection via MCP possible, for smaller offices with their own accounting |
Is your software missing from the list? Much of the daily work runs on the mailbox and on documents and needs no system connection at all: sorting the enquiries, the service charge explanation, the handover report. How a connection via MCP works in principle, and which systems are prepared, is described on the integrations page.
Data protection: tenant files are sensitive
A tenant file holds more than a name and an address: debt collection register extracts, credit reports, proof of income, sometimes a social assistance confirmation or a medical certificate. Most of that is ordinary personal data. Information about social assistance measures and about health, by contrast, counts as sensitive personal data under Article 5 of the Data Protection Act.7 Responsibility stays with the management office in any case, even when an AI tool processes the data. If a provider processes the data on its behalf, Article 9 of the Data Protection Act applies: the provider may only do what the office itself would be allowed to do, it has to ensure data security, and it may pass work on to a subcontractor only with prior approval.7 This article is not legal advice.
On top of that come the expectations of the owners. Institutional owners such as pension funds and insurers regularly require in their management contracts that the data of their properties is processed in Switzerland. Kisuno runs in data centres of Green in Lupfig that are certified to ISO 27001, or on your own server.
Customer data does not train any models, and permissions apply down to individual tools. Every access is recorded in the audit log, a record you can export at any time. The data processing agreement and the subprocessor list are published openly on the website. One thing belongs in the same answer: on offer are the current models from OpenAI (ChatGPT) and Anthropic (Claude); they run in the AWS data centre in Frankfurt. AWS is a US company, so the US CLOUD Act applies even with servers in Frankfurt, and we say so openly. For customers with higher data-protection requirements, open frontier models such as GLM, Kimi and DeepSeek are available, operated by European companies on servers in Europe; the CLOUD Act does not apply there. Anyone who has to rule that out runs the model and the instance themselves. When an owner asks where the data of their properties is held, you can answer both points in one sentence.
Frequently asked questions from property management
Does the AI reply to tenants directly?
No. Every reply to a tenant is a draft that the responsible property manager reads, corrects and approves. A language model, the program behind the AI, can produce errors. That is why every text is a draft for review, not a verified statement.
What about terminations and rent adjustments?
They stay with the management office. Legally binding notices such as terminations, rent adjustments tied to the reference interest rate and formal warnings are subject to formal requirements and never go out automatically. When the landlord terminates a lease of residential or commercial premises, Article 266l of the Code of Obligations requires a form approved by the canton. A rent increase must likewise be notified and justified on that form under Article 269d of the Code of Obligations, at least ten days before the notice period starts; without the form or the reasons, the increase is void. For apartments the ordinary notice period under Article 266c of the Code of Obligations is three months to a locally customary date, and a termination can be challenged before the conciliation authority within 30 days under Article 273 of the Code of Obligations.6 At most, the AI colleague prepares text. The form, the deadlines and the dispatch remain the responsibility of the office. This answer is not legal advice.
How does the AI know what the tenancy agreement says?
From the knowledge base. For each property you upload the tenancy agreements, the house rules, the regulations and the previous correspondence. The draft is built from them and names the source, so the statement can be checked in seconds.
May tenant data go into an AI tool at all?
Under the revised Swiss Data Protection Act the management office remains responsible and signs a contract on commissioned data processing with the provider. Kisuno runs in Switzerland or on your own server, customer data does not train any models, and every access is recorded in the audit log. The data processing agreement and the subprocessor list are published openly on the website. The current models from OpenAI (ChatGPT) and Anthropic (Claude) run in the AWS data centre in Frankfurt; AWS is a US company, so the US CLOUD Act applies even with servers in Frankfurt, and we say so openly. For customers with higher data-protection requirements, open frontier models such as GLM, Kimi and DeepSeek are available, operated by European companies on servers in Europe; the CLOUD Act does not apply there. This answer is not legal advice.
Do we need a tenant portal for this?
No. The AI colleague works in the shared inbox you already have. Tenants write to the same address as before and notice nothing of the workflow behind it.
Does Kisuno work with GARAIO REM, Abacus or ImmoTop2?
That depends on the interface. The table above shows the state of play for GARAIO REM, Abacus, ImmoTop2, Rimo R5 and other programs. Where a connection is missing, the route runs via exports and documents. The workflows built on the mailbox and the knowledge base work without any system connection anyway.
What does it cost for an office with fifteen people?
The managed instance costs CHF 7 (EUR 7.50) per person per month. Through the end of the current month: 50 percent off with a twelve-month term, that is CHF 3.50 (EUR 3.75) per person per month. Testing is free and not limited in time: every new account starts with a starting credit of CHF 50 (EUR 55) for model usage, with no payment details. If you self-host, the software costs nothing: the LibreChat base is MIT licensed, and the repository with our own extensions follows shortly. All details are on the pricing page.
How do we start?
With one property. The house rules, the regulations and the tenancy agreements of that property go into the knowledge base, the shared inbox is connected, and the property manager works with drafts for two weeks. Whatever comes up flows back into the templates, and the next properties follow.
See it on a property of your own
Bring a set of house rules and a few real tenant enquiries, and we will walk through the workflow together. Or sign up and be among the first to start.
Sources
All figures and interface details in this article come from the following sources, last checked in September 2026.
- pom+ Consulting, Digital Real Estate Index 2026, media release of 9 March 2026, around 200 specialists and executives surveyed: pom.ch
- SVIT, Real Estate Symposium: shortage of qualified staff in the Swiss real estate sector, 12 January 2024: realestatesymposium.ch
- GARAIO REM, developer guide with the GraphQL interface and the message bus: github.com
- W&W Immo Informatik, documentation of the ImmoTop2 DMS interface: github.com
- SwissRETS, open standard for property data: github.com
- Swiss Code of Obligations, Articles 257b, 257g, 266c, 266l, 269d and 273, wording in the Classified Compilation of Federal Legislation: fedlex.admin.ch
- Swiss Data Protection Act, Articles 5 and 9, wording in the Classified Compilation of Federal Legislation: fedlex.admin.ch
Last reviewed: